Inside this Article:
- श्री आदिषङ्कराचार्यस्य जन्मविवरण (śrī ādiṣaṅkarācāryasya janmavivaraṇa – birth details of Sri Adi Shankaracharya)
- श्री आदि शंकराचार्य दिव्यावतारः ( śrī ādi śa ṁ karācārya divyāvatāra ḥ – Sri Adi Shankaracharya is the divine incarnation )
- गुरुपरंपरा (guruparaṃparā - preceptor-lineage)
- दिग्विजययात्र ( digvijayayātra – global conquest pilgrimage)
- अमानया विद्यामठ (a mānāya vidyāmaṭha – traditional / orthodox monastic schools)
- श्री आदिषङ्कराचार्यस्य शास्त्रीययोगदानम् ( śrī ādiṣa ṅ karācāryasya śāstrīyay ō gad ā nam – Scriotural contributtion of Sri Adi Shankaracharya)
- औपचारिक स्थापक षण्मतसंप्रदायस्य (aupacārika sthāpaka ṣaṇmatasaṃpradāyasya – formal establisher of six-theology tradition)
- दर्शनदर्शीक केवलाद्वैतवेदान्तस्य ( darśanadarśīka kevalādvaitavedāntasya – philosophy perspective of absolute non-dualistic final gnosis)
- निगमन (nigamana - conclusion)
- संलग्न (saṃlagna - appendix)
जय जय शङ्कर हर हर शङ्कर॥
श्री गुरुभ्यो नमः (śrī gurubhyo namaḥ - salutations to guru)
Today is the sacred
महा अवतार जयन्ति (mahā avatāra jayanti - sacred incarnation anniversary)
of His Holiness
जगत् गुरु श्री आदि शंकराचार्य भगवर्पाद (jagat guru śrī ādi śaṁkarācārya bhagavarpāda)
. He is one of the noblest of saintly gurus who walked on earth. He is aptly respected as the
जगत् गुरु (jagat guru - universal preceptor)
because of his unparalleled contribution to universal religio-spiritual heritage. To quote Swami Vivekananda :
“ India has to live, and the spirit of the Lords descended again. He who declared, "I will come whenever virtue subsides", came again, and this time the manifestation was in the South, and up rose that young brahmin of whom it has been declared that at the age of sixteen he had completed all his writings; the marvelous boy Shankaracharya arose. The writings of this boy of sixteen are the wonders of the modern world, and so was the boy. He wanted to bring back the Indian world to its pristine purity, but think of the amount of the task before him…. The greatest teacher of the Vedanta philosophy was Shankaracharya. By solid reasoning he extracted from the Vedas the truths of Vedanta, and on them built up the wonderful system of Jnana that is taught in his commentaries. He unified all the conflicting descriptions of Brahman and showed that there is only one Infinite Reality. He showed too that as man can only travel slowly on the upward road, all the varied presentations are needed to suit his varying capacity."
Yes, श्री आदि शङ्कराचार्य भगवत्पाद (śrī ādi śaṅkarācārya bhagavatpāda) was one of the earliest pioneers in उत्तरमीमांसावेदान्तदर्शन (uttaramīmāṃsāvedāntadarśana– posterior inquiry final-gnosis philosophy) , who gifted us with the philosophical treasure-house viz. केवलाद्वैतवेदान्तदर्शन (kevalādtvaita vedānta darśana – absolute non-dualistic final-wisdom philosophy) very emphatically establishing that the सच्चिदानन्द परब्रह्मन् (s atcitānanda parabrahman – omnicient omnipotent omnibliss absolute divinity) is the one and only नित्य कैवल्य सत्य (n itya kaivalya satya - eternal absolute reality) To borrow Swami Vivekananda's famous verses -
" Each soul is potentially divine " and " Religion is the manifestation of (this potential) divinity already in man ."
श्री आदिषङ्कराचार्यस्य जन्मविवरण (śrī ādiṣaṅkarācāryasya janmavivaraṇa – birth details of Sri Adi Shankaracharya)
According to the traditional
वाक्यपञ्चाङ्ग
(vākyapañcāṅga – revealed almanac),
the sacred annual event of
श्री आदि शंकराचार्य महाजयन्ति
(śrī ādi śaṃkarācārya mahājayanti) which commemorates the
महावतारदिन
(mahāvatāradina – supreme incarnation day)
of His Holiness
जगत् गुरु श्री आदि शंकराचार्य भगवर्पाद
(
jagat guru śrī ādi śaṁkarācārya bhagavarpāda)
is observed on the
शुक्लपक्ष पञ्चमीतिथि वैशक मासस्य
(śuklapakṣa pañcamītithi vaiśaka māsasya – fifth lunar day of waxing fortnight)
occurring in the month of
वैशाखमास
(vaiśākhamāsa – mid April-mid May month).
परमाचार्य श्री माधवविद्यारण्य स्वामिन् (paramācārya śrī mādhavavidyāraṇya svāmin) in his famous hagiographical treatise called संक्षेपशंकरविजय (saṃkṣepaśaṃkaravijaya) more popularly known by the name शंकरदिग्वैजय (śaṃkaradigvaijaya) records thus:
According to traditional account as provided in scriptures like the शिवरहस्य (śivarahasya) , शशलग्राम (śaśalagrāma) which now forms part Cochin/Ernakulam district in the state of Kerala. In the शंकरदिग्वैजय (śaṃkaradigvaijaya) refers to the name of this village as कालडि/कालटि (kālaḍi/kālaṭi).
While there are not much disputes regarding the जन्म/अवतारस्थल (janma/avatārasthala – place of birth / incarnation) amongst traditionalists and historians, there are major disagreements when it comes to His वर्ष जन्मस्य (varṣa janmasya – year of birth) as well as the place of his समाधिस्थल (samādhisthala – atonement place). While the orthodox accounts trace his birth to the year 509 BC / BCE, the more conservative versions of modern historians trace his year of birth to around 648 AD/CE
For example,
आचार्य श्री आत्मबोध
(ācārya śrī ātmabodha)
in his famous hagiographical treatise by name
प्राचीनशंकरविजय
(prācīnaśaṃkaravijaya)
traces the
वर्ष जन्मस्य
(varṣa janmasya – year of birth)
as follows
The following is the sacred
जनंकुण्डली आदिशंकराचार्यस्य
(janaṃkuṇḍalī ādiśaṃkarācāryasya – natal chart of Adi Shankaracharya)
according to B.V. Raman, the eminent astrologer
श्री आदि शंकराचार्य दिव्यावतारः ( śrī ādi śa ṁ karācārya divyāvatāra ḥ – Sri Adi Shankaracharya is the divine incarnation )
श्री आदिशंकराचार्यभगवत्पाद
(śrī ādiśaṃkarācāryabhagavatpāda),
according to the orthodox
वैदिकसंप्रदाय
(vaidikasaṃpradāya – vedic tradition),
is not considered as a mere
माणुष्यगुरु
(māṇuṣyaguru – human preceptor)
but rather, as the
साक्षात् अवतार ईश्वरस्य
(sākṣāt avatāra īśvarasya – direct incarnation of god).
श्री आदिशंकराचार्यभगवत्पाद
(śrī ādiśaṃkarācāryabhagavatpāda),
according to the orthodox
वैदिकसंप्रदाय
(vaidikasaṃpradāya – vedic tradition),
is not considered as a mere
माणुष्यगुरु
(māṇuṣyaguru – human preceptor)
but rather, as the
साक्षात् अवतार ईश्वरस्य
(sākṣāt avatāra īśvarasya – direct incarnation of god).
For instance, it is a widely accepted belief that the
जगद्गुरु
(jagadguru – universal preceptor)
is none other than the
देवमीढांश श्री परमशिवस्य
(devamīḍhāṃśa śrī paramaśivasya –god-begotten fractal of Lord Parama-Shiva).
This fact is testified by various scriptures including the traditional hagiographical treatises on the saint. For example, the following verses from the sacred
शिवरहस्य
(śivarahasya)
categorically testifies thus:
Again,
श्री अनन्तानन्दगिरि
(śrī anantānandagiri)
in his famous
अनन्तानन्दगिरीयशंकरविजय
(anantānandagirīyaśaṃkaravijaya)
also
clearly establishes this fact that
श्री आदिशंकराचार्यभगवत्पाद
(śrī ādiśaṃkarācāryabhagavatpāda)
was non other than the
अंशावतारपरमशिवस्य
(aṃśāvatāraparamaśivasya – partial incarnation of Lord Parama Shiva)
.
गुरुपरंपरा (guruparaṃparā - preceptor-lineage)
In fact, not only the श्री आदिशंकराचार्यभगवत्पाद (śrī ādiśaṃkarācāryabhagavatpāda), but the entire गुरुपरंपरा स्मार्तमतसंप्रदायस्य (guruparaṃparā smārtamatasaṃpradāyasya – preceptor-lineage of Smarta theological tradition) has direct divine association as depicted in the below chart:
Traditionally, श्री आदि शङ्कराचार्य भगवत्पाद (śrī ādi śaṅkarācārya bhagavatpāda) belongs to the स्मार्तमतसंप्रदाय ( smārtamatasaṃpradāya - smartha theological tradition). Hence , we shall first look at the गुरुपरंपरा स्मार्तमतसंप्रदायस्य (guruparaṃparā smārtamatasaṃpradāyasya – preceptor-lineage of Smarta theological tradition). For example,
A similar lineage is also mentioned in the गुरुरत्नमाल (gururatnamāla) - a famous treatise composed by His Holiness श्री सदाशिव ब्रह्मेन्द्र सरस्वती (śrī sadāśiva brahmendra sarasvatī) who was the षट्पञ्चाश पीठाधिपति श्रीकाञ्चिकामकोटि पीठस्य (ṣaṭpañcāśa pīṭhādhipati śrīkāñcikāmakoṭi pīṭhasya – fifthy-sixth pontiff ofSri Kanchi Kamakoti Pitham)
While the above chart depicts the overall गुरुपरंपरा स्मार्तमतसंप्रदायस्य (guruparaṃparā smārtamatasaṃpradāyasya – preceptor-lineage of Smarta theological tradition) , from a philosophical standpoint of advocators of the केवलाद्वैतवेदान्तदर्शन , the गुरुपरंपरा ( guruparaṃparā – preceptor lineage ) can be classified as follows:
दिग्विजययात्र ( digvijayayātra – global conquest pilgrimage)
Again, through his दिग्विजययात्र ( digvijayayātra – global conquest pilgrimage) by travelling the four across cardinal directions including the चार्धम् ( caturdham – four abodes) and thereby covering the length and breadth of भारतव्रश ( bhāratavraśa – Indian sub-continent)
The noble saint and
Sage of Kanchi
,
परमाचार्य श्री चन्द्रशेकरेन्द्र सरस्वती
(paramācārya śrī candraśekarendra sarasvatī)
summarizes thus about the
दिग्विजययात्र
श्री आदिशंकराचार्यस्य
(
digvijayayātra śrī ādiśaṃkarācāryasya – global conquest pilgrimage):
Thus the
Parivrat (wandering monk), who expounds the hidden meaning of the
Upanishads
in the words of his commentaries which are clear and deep, wanders about. He wanders everywhere from the
Setu
to the Himalayas. He visits the holy rivers. He goes to the pilgrim-places. He tours the villages. He goes to the towns. He visits the temples. In those places, he augments the Presence Divine through such means as
mantras
and
yantras
. There is almost no holy place in India whose greatness has not been strengthened by
Sankara
’
s
visit. Even to this day people in the different parts of the country say: “This temple in our territory has been purified by the
splendor
of the
mantra
uttered by Sri
Sankaracharya
; and has been rendered great by the installation of
yantras
.” In the entire area where the Veda has spread ––
Anga, Vanga, Kalinga, Andhra, Dravida, Kerala, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Saurashtra, Malava, Gurjara, Sindhu, Gandhara, Kuru, Panchala, Kasmira, Nepala, Maithila, Kanyakubja, Magadha, Kamarupa, Kamboja
,
etc. –– there is no place where the Bhashya of
Sri
Sankaracharya
was not known to the seekers of release. Even now it is so in every place where the
Veda
is in vogue.
अमानया विद्यामठ (a mānāya vidyāmaṭha – traditional / orthodox monastic schools)
Eventually, he is known to have established
अमानया विद्यामठ
(a
mānāya vidyāmaṭha – traditional / orthodox monastic schools)
across India. He then formally designated chosen four of his principle disciples, entrusting them the responsibility of heading and manage these establishments.
C
ategory
|
गोवर्धन
पिठं
(govardhana piṭhaṁ)
|
श्री
शारदा
पीठं
(śrī śāradā pīṭhaṁ)
|
द्वारक
पीठं
(dvāraka pīṭhaṁ)
|
ज्योतिर्मठ्पीठं
(jyotirmaṭh pīṭhaṁ)
|
दिक्
(dik - direction)
|
पूर्व
आम्नाय
(pūrva āmnāya – eastern tradition)
|
दक्षिन
आम्नाय
(dakṣina āmnāya – southern tradition)
|
पश्चिम
आम्नाय
(paścima āmnāya – western tradition)
|
ज्योतिर्मठ्पीठं
(jyotirmaṭh pīṭhaṁ)
|
दिव्यदेश
(divyadeśa – sacred space)
|
जगन्नाथ्
पूरि
(jagannāth pūri)
|
शृङ्गेरी
(śṛṅgerī)
|
द्वारक
(dvāraka)
|
बदरी
(badarī)
|
प्रथम
पीठाधिपति
(prathama pīṭhādhipati – first chairperson)
|
आचार्य
पद्मपाद
(ācārya padmapāda)
|
सुरेश्वराचार्य
(sureśvarācārya)
|
हस्तामलकाचार्य
(hastāmalakācārya)
|
तोटकाचार्य
(toṭakācārya)
|
वेदसंहिता
(vedasaṃhitā – vedic corpus)
|
ऋग्वेदसंहिता
(ṛgvedasaṃhitā)
|
यजुर्वेदसंहिता
(yajurvedasaṁhitā)
|
सामवेदसंहिता
(sāmavedasaṁhitā
|
अथर्वणवेदसंहिता
(atharvaṇavedasaṁhitā)
|
महावाक्य
(mahāvākya – supreme vedict)
|
प्रज्ञानम्
ब्रह्म
(prajñānam brahma – God is absolute wisdom)
|
अहं
ब्रह्मास्मि
(ahaṁ brahmāsmi - I am Divine)
|
तत्
त्वम्
असि
(tat tvam asi - thou art that)
|
अयम्
आत्मा
ब्रह्म
(ayam ātmā brahma - this self is God)
|
संप्रदाय
(saṃpradāya - tradition)
|
भोग्वार्
संप्रदाय
(bhogvār saṃpradāya)
|
रामेशवर् र्संप्रदाय
(rāmeśavar saṃpradāya – insect tradition)
|
कीट्वा र्संप्रदाय
(kīṭvār saṃpradāya – insect tradition)
|
आनन्द्वार्
संप्रदाय
(ānandvār saṃpradāya)
|
अधिकारदेव
(adhikāradeva – presiding god)
|
श्रीमन् जगन्नाथ्
(śrīman jagannāth)
|
श्रीमन् आदिवराह
(śrīman ādivarāha)
|
श्रीमन् सिद्धेश्वर
(śrīman siddheśvara)
|
श्रीमन् नारायण
(śrīman nārāyaṇa)
|
अधिकादेवी
(adhikāradevī – presiding goddess)
|
श्रीमती विमल
(śrīmati vimala)
|
श्रीमती सरस्वती
(śrīmati sarasvatī)
|
श्रीमती भद्रकाली
(śrīmati bhadrakālī)
|
श्रीमती पुण्यगिरी
(śrīmati puṇyagirī)
|
महऋषिमुनिगोत्र
(mahaṛṣimunigotra – supreme-seer-sage genus)
|
कश्यपमहऋषि
(kaśyapamahaṛṣi)
|
भूर्भुवःमहऋषि
(bhūrbhuvaḥmahaṛṣi)
|
आविगत्महऋषि
(āvigatmahaṛṣi)
|
भृगमहऋषि
(bhṛgamahaṛṣi)
|
पुण्यतीर्थ
(puṇyatīrtha – sacred stream)
|
महोदधि
(mahodadhi)
|
तुङ्गबद्र
(tuṅgabadra)
|
गोमथी
(gomathī)
|
अलक्नन्द
(alaknanda)
|
नाम ब्रह्मचारिनाश्रमस्य
(nāma brahmacārināśramasya – name of celibate stage)
|
प्रकाश
(prakāśa - effulgence)
|
चैतन्य
(caitanya - consciousness)
|
स्वरूप
(svarūpa – inherent nature)
|
आनन्द
(ānanda- bliss)
|
नाम संन्यासिनस्य
(nāma saṃnyāsinasya – name of ascetic)
|
तीर्थ
संन्यासिन्
(tirtha sanyāsin – stream ascetic),
आश्रम
संन्यासिन्
(āśrama sanyāsin – hermit ascetic)
|
सरस्वती
संन्यासिन्
(sarasvatī sanyāsin),
भरती
संन्यासिन्
(bharatī sanyāsin – ascetic without bondage),
पूरि
संन्यासिन्
(pūri sanyāsin- town ascetic)
|
वन
संन्यासिन्
(vana sanyāsin – forest ascetic) &
आरण्य
संन्यासिन्
(āraṇya sanyāsin – jungle
ascetic)
|
गिरि संन्यासिन्
(giri sanyāsin – hill ascetic),
पर्वथ
संन्यासिन्
(parvatha sanyāsin – mountain ascetic) &
सागर संन्यासिन्
(sāgara sanyāsin – sea ascetic)
|
As indicated in the above table, each मठ ( maṭha - monastery) corresponds to one of the four वेदसंहिता ( vedasaṃhitā – vedic corpus) . Here, the लक्षण सन्यासससंप्रदाय (lakṣaṇa saṃyāsasaṃpradāyasya – nature of ascetic tradition) formally established by श्री आदिशंकराचार्यभगवत्पाद (śrī ādiśaṃkarācāryabhagavatpāda) is technically called as एकदण्डि संयाससंप्रदाय (ekadaṇḍi saṃyāsasaṃpradāya – single staff scetic tradition) which is further sub-classified by him into a nomenclature having ten kinds of sub-titles technically called as दशनामी सम्प्रदाय (daśanāmī sampradaya – ten names tradition). And as indicated in the above table, these दशनामी सम्प्रदाय (daśanāmī sampradaya – ten names tradition) is further mapped with the आम्नायविद्यामठाः ( āmnāyavidyāmaṭhāḥ – traditional monastraries). Interestingly, each नाम संन्यासिनस्य (nāma saṃnyāsinasya – name of ascetic) is also mapped to a specific मुख्योपनिषद् (mukhyopaniṣad – principal upanishad) , as indicated in the table below:
#
|
नाम संन्यासिनस्य
(nāma saṃnyāsinasya – name of ascetic)
|
मुख्योपनिषद्
(mukhyopaniṣad – principal upanishad)
|
A
|
गोवर्धन
पिठं
(govardhana piṭhaṁ)
|
|
1 |
तीर्थ
संन्यासिन्
(tirtha sanyāsin – stream ascetic)
|
केनोपनिषद्
(kenopaniṣad)
|
2 |
आश्रम
संन्यासिन्
(āśrama sanyāsin – hermit ascetic)
|
छान्दोग्योपनिषद्
(chāndogyopaniṣad)
|
B
|
द्वारक
पीठं
(dvāraka pīṭhaṁ)
|
|
3 |
वन
संन्यासिन्
(vana sanyāsin – forest ascetic)
|
ऐतेर्योपनिषद्
(aiteryopaniṣad)
|
4 |
आरण्य
संन्यासिन्
(āraṇya sanyāsin – jungle ascetic)
|
कौषीतकीयुपनिषद्
(kauṣītakīyupaniṣad)
|
C
|
श्री
शारदा
पीठं
(śrī śāradā pīṭhaṁ)
|
|
5 |
सरस्वती
संन्यासिन्
(sarasvatī sanyāsin)
|
बृहदारण्यकोपनिषद्
(bṛhadāraṇyakopaniṣad)
|
6 |
भरती
संन्यासिन्
(bharatī sanyāsin – ascetic without bondage)
|
तैत्तिरीयोपनिषद्
(taittirīyopaniṣad)
|
7 |
पूरि
संन्यासिन्
(pūri sanyāsin- town ascetic)
|
कठोपनिषद्
(kaṭhopaniṣad)
|
D
|
ज्योतिर्मठ्पीठं
(jyotirmaṭh pīṭhaṁ)
|
|
8 |
गिरि संन्यासिन्
(giri sanyāsin – hill ascetic)
|
मुण्डकोपनिषद्
(muṇḍakopaniṣad)
|
9 |
पर्वथ
संन्यासिन्
(parvatha sanyāsin – mountain ascetic)
|
प्रश्नोपनिषद्
(praśnopaniṣad)
|
10 |
सागर संन्यासिन्
(sāgara sanyāsin – sea ascetic)
|
माण्डूक्योपनिषद्
(māṇḍūkyopaniṣad)
|
The contribution of
श्री
आदिशंकराचार्यभगवत्पाद
(śrī ādiśaṃkarācāryabhagavatpāda)
does not stop with fomally establishing the
आम्नायविद्यामठाः
(
āmnāyavidyāmaṭhāḥ – traditional monastraries)
or even
दशनामी सम्प्रदाय
(daśanāmī samprad
ā
ya – ten names tradition)
. He also played a pivotal role in creating a formal defence system against the breaking forces of
सनातनधर्म हिन्दुसमयस्य
(sanātanadharma hindusamayasya – eternal soirituality of hindu religion).
For example, he was one of the pioneers in establishing what is called as the नागसंन्याससंप्रदाय (nāgasaṃnyāsasaṃpradāya – snake ascetic tradition) who are technically अस्त्रधारिणः (astradhāriṇaḥ - weapon holders). In other words, the दशनामी सम्प्रदाय (daśanāmī samprad ā ya – ten names tradition) was further categorized into two groups viz. the traditional शास्त्रधारिणः (śāstradhāriṇaḥ- scripture holders) on the one hand who ensure in intelectual protection of सनातनधर्म हिन्दुसमयस्य (sanātanadharma hindusamayasya – eternal soirituality of hindu religion) while there were the नागसाध्वः (nāgasādhvaḥ - snake saints) who provided the physical defence to the same.
Historically speaking, each of the above
आम्नायविद्यामठाः
(
āmnāyavidyāmaṭhāḥ – traditional monastraries)
provided formal military (self-defence training) to the
नागसाध्वः
(nāgasādhvaḥ - snake saints)
at the
रक्षा अखाडा
(rakṣā akhāḍā – defence academy).
For example,
अवाहन् अखाडा
(avāhan akhāḍā),
अटल अखाडा
(aṭala akhāḍā),
निर्वाणि अखाडा
(nirvāṇi akhāḍā),
भैरवी अखाडा
(bhairavī akhāḍā),
आनन्द अखाडा
(ānanda akhāḍā) &
निरञ्जनी अखाडा
(nirañjanī akhāḍā)
are some famous ancient examples.
Having established the four monasteries, श्री आदि शङ्कराचार्य भगवत्पाद (śrī ādi śaṅkarācārya bhagavatpāda) himself became the प्रथम पीठाधिपति ( prathama pīṭhādhipati – first chairperson) of the श्री काञ्ची कामकोटि पीठं ( śrī kāñcī kāmakoṭi pīṭhaṁ) which is considered as the सर्व ज्ञान पिठ ( sarva jñāna piṭha – throne of omniscience) .
It is also widely believed that श्री आदि शङ्कराचार्य भगवत्पाद (śrī ādi śaṅkarācārya bhagavatpāda) was instrumental in constructing the sacred श्री काञ्चीकामाक्षी दिव्यक्षेत्र (śrī kāñcīkāmākṣī divyakṣetra – sacred Kanchi Kamakashi temple) and formally consecrating the श्रीचक्रयन्त्रमण्डल (śrīcakrayantramaṇḍala) before ascending the सर्व ज्ञान पिठ ( sarva jñāna piṭha – throne of omniscience) . This fact is testified through various authentic orthodox sources. For example, श्री मार्कण्डेयमहापुराण संहिता (śrī mārkaṇḍeyamahāpurāṇa saṃhitā) very categorically eshtablishes this fact . Again, परमाचार्य श्री माधवविद्यारण्य स्वामिन् (paramācārya śrī mādhavavidyāraṇya svāmin) in his famous hagiographical treatise called संक्षेपशंकरविजय (saṃkṣepaśaṃkaravijaya), more popularly known by the name शंकरदिग्वैजय (śaṃkaradigvaijaya) records thus :
The formal consecration of
श्रीचक्रयन्त्रमण्डल
(śrīcakrayantramaṇḍala)
is also testified by both
श्री चिद्विलासाचार्य
(śrī cidvilāsācārya)
and
श्री आनन्दगिरियाचार्य
(śrī ānandagiriyācārya)
in their famous
hagiographical treatises called
चिद्विलासियशंकरविजय
(cidvilāsiyaśaṃkaravijaya) &
श्री
आनन्दगिर्यशंकरविजय
(śrī ānandagiryaśaṃkaravijaya)
respectively.
By establishing these monastic orders श्री आदि शङ्कराचार्य भगवत्पाद (śrī ādi śaṅkarācārya bhagavatpāda) also played a pivotal role in integrating the pan Indian cultural belief systems across Hindus into common identity as one religion - हिन्दुधर्म (hindudharma - Hinduism) .
Again, श्री आदि शङ्कराचार्य भगवत्पाद (śrī ādi śaṅkarācārya bhagavatpāda) following the foot steps of श्री व्यास महऋषि (śrī vyāsa mahaṛṣi) established the inherent divinity in all phenomenal manifestation reflecting the wisdom of the महावाक्यानि (m ahāvākyāni - supreme declarations) , as revealed in the चतुर्वेदसंहिताः (caturvedasaṃhitāḥ - four vedic corpuses)
# |
वेदसंहिता
(
vedasaṃhitā – vedic corpus)
|
मुख्योपनिषद्
(mukhyopaniṣad – principal upanishad)
|
महावाक्य
(mahāvākya – supreme vedict)
|
1 |
ऋग्वेदसंहिता
(
ṛgvedasaṃhitā)
|
ऐतरेयोपनिषद्
(aitareyopaniṣad)
|
प्रज्ञानम् ब्रह्म
(
prajñānam brahma – God is absolute wisdom)
|
2 |
यजुर्वेदसंहिता
(yajur
vedasaṁhitā
)
|
बृहदारण्यकोपनिषद्
(bṛhadāraṇyakopaniṣad)
|
अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
(
ahaṁ brahmāsmi - I am Divine)
|
3 |
सामवेदसंहिता
(
sāmavedasaṁhitā
|
छान्दोग्योपनिषद्
(chāndogyopaniṣad)
|
तत् त्वम् असि
(
tat tvam asi - thou art that)
|
4 |
अथर्वणवेदसंहिता
(
atharvaṇavedasaṁhitā)
|
माण्डुक्योपनिषद्
(māṇḍukyopaniṣad)
|
अयम् आत्मा ब्रह्म
(
ayam ātmā brahma - this self is God)
|
In fact, in the small treatise वाक्य वृत्तिः (vākya vṛttiḥ), the आचार्य (ācārya - preceptor) preaches the spiritual significance of महा वाक्य (mahā vākya - supreme declarations) especially on तत् त्वम् असि (tat tvam asi - thou art that) & अहं ब्रह्मास्मि (ahaṁ brahmāsmi - I am Divine)
In a nutshell, श्री आदि शंक्राचार्य (śrī ādi śaṁkrācārya) helped drive home the spiritual message of Universal Divinity irrespective one’s caste, creed, religion, nationality etc. The following verses from his मनिषा पञ्चकम् (maniṣā pañcakam – five fold considerations) very clearly highlights his universal non-dualistic outlook.
Moreover, according to
श्री आदि शङ्कराचार्य भगवत्पाद
(śrī ādi śaṅkarācārya bhagavatpāda)
,
it is our
अविद्यामाया
(
avidyāmāyā- nescient mystery)
that hides our divine potential and limits us to the confines of
अहंकार
(
ahaṁkāra - self arrogation)
leading to
अहमिदम्भेद
(ahamidambheda – I–this difference)
.
In my humble opinion,
श्री आदि शङ्कराचार्य भगवत्पाद
(śrī ādi śaṅkarācārya bhagavatpāda)
is truly a
जगत्गुरु
(
jagat guru - universal preceptor)
in this sense as well. He helped us realize that all kinds of disparities are temporary and unity is the permanent reality. With the dawn of spiritual enlightenment (wisdom), differences across all phenomenal manifestations across the world can potentially be integrated into the
कैवल्य अद्वैत एकत्वम्
(
kaivalya advaita ekatvam - absolute non dual singularity)
.
Interestingly, recent discoveries in modern physics also echoes a similar concept of absolute cosmic singularity.
Of course his contribution to spirituality does not end here. He is also one of the greatest pan-Indian holistic synthesizers of heterogeneous theological / philosophical schools viz.
वैदीक
(
vaidīka - vedic)
,
तान्त्रिक
(
tāntrika - tantrik)
,
आगम
(
āgama - agamic)
,
पुराण
(
purāṇa - mythological)
etc. into a homogeneous system of Hindu philosophy. He also wisely incorporated the learning and best practices from
योगदर्शन
(
yogadarśana),
सांख्यदर्शन
(
sāṃkhyadarśana),
वैशेषिकदर्शन
(
vaiśeṣikadarśana),
न्यायदर्शन
(
nyāyadarśana),
पूर्वमीमांसदर्शन
(
pūrvamīmāṃsadarśana),
उत्तरमीमांसदर्शन
(
uttaramīmāṃsadarśana)
.
He also helped in a two way (both from & to) wisdom adoption with other popular heterodox religions of his times - बौद्धधर्म (bauddhadharma - Buddhism) and जैनधरम (jainadharama - Jainism) etc., into mainstream हिन्दुधर्म (hindudharma - Hinduism) . To quote Dr. Sarvepalli S Radhakrishnan:
"
Sankara present to us the true ideal of philosophy, which is not so much knowledge as wisdom, not so much logical learning as spiritual freedom. For Sankara, as for some of the greatest thinkers of the world like Plato and Plotinus, Spinoza and Hegel, Philosophy is the austere vision of eternal truth, majestic in its freedom from the petty cares of man's paltry life. Through the massive and at the same time subtle dialectic of Sankara there shows forth a vivid, emotional temperament, without which philosophy tends to become a mere game of logic. A master of the strictest logic, he is also master of a noble and animated poetry which belongs to another order. The rays of his genius have illumined the dark places of thought and soothed the sorrows of the most forlorn heart. While his philosophy fortifies and consoles many, there are, of course, those to whom it seems to be an abyss of contradiction and darkness. But whether we agree or differ, the penetrating light of his mind never leaves us where we were....Sankara appeared, at one and the same time, as an eager champion of the orthodox faith and a spiritual reformer. He tried to bring back the age from the brilliant luxury of the Puranas to the mystic truth of the Upanishads. The power of the faith to lead the soul to the higher life became for him the test of its strength. He felt impelled to attempt the spiritual direction of his age by formulating a philosophy and religion which could satisfy the ethical and spiritual needs of the people
".
श्री आदिषङ्कराचार्यस्य शास्त्रीययोगदानम् ( śrī ādiṣa ṅ karācāryasya śāstrīyay ō gad ā nam – Scriotural contributtion of Sri Adi Shankaracharya)
श्री आदिशंकराचार्य भगवद्पाद ( śrī ādiśaṁkarācārya bhagavadpāda) has made unparalleled contribution to the भारतीयसनातनधर्म (bhāratīyasanātanadharma – Indian eternal spirituality) by creating a huge corpus of scriptural treatises, which is estimated to be around 153 in number including
#
|
Category
|
Count
|
1 |
भाष्य ग्रन्थाः
(bhāṣya granthāḥ - commentary treatises)
|
23 |
2 |
प्रकरण ग्रन्थाः
(prakaraṇa granthāḥ - explanatory treatises)
|
54 |
3 |
स्तोत्र स्तुति ग्रन्थाः
(stotra stuti granthāḥ - eulogical treatizes)
|
76 |
Total
|
153
|
Some of the important शास्त्रीय ग्रन्थाः ( śāstrīya granthāḥ - scriptural treatises) that are attributed to श्री आदिशंकराचार्य भगवद्पाद ( śrī ādiśaṁkarācārya bhagavadpāda) can further be classified as follows
He also helped in consolidating the huge corpus of Vedic scriptures and streamlining their underlying philosophic essence by writing भाष्याणि ( bhāṣyāṇi - commentaries) on the प्रस्थानत्रयी ( prasthāna trayī – triple sources) of orthodox Hindu scriptures viz.
# |
प्रस्थान शास्त्र
(prasthāna śāstra- source scripture)
|
Focus
|
1 |
मुख्योपनिषदः
(mukhyopaniṣadaḥ)
|
श्रुति प्रस्थान
(śruti prasthāna – scriptural source)
|
2 |
ब्रह्म सूत्र / शारीरक सूत्र (brahma sūtra / śārīraka sūtra ) |
युक्ति प्रस्थान
(yukti prasthāna – logical source)
|
3 |
श्रीमद् भगवद्गीता (śrīmad bhagavadgītā) |
साधन प्रस्थान
(sādhana prasthāna – instrumental source)
|
Let's take the मुख्योपनिषदः (mukhyopaniṣadaḥ - principal upanishads) which are technically categorized as श्रुति प्रस्थान (śruti prasthāna – scriptural source). It is widely believed that श्री आदि शङ्कराचार्य भगवत्पाद (śrī ādi śaṅkarācārya bhagavatpāda) has written these detailed commentaries
#
|
भाष्य
(bhāṣya - commentary)
|
1 |
ऐत्रेय उपनिषद् भाष्य
(aitreya upaniṣad bhāṣya)
|
2 |
बृहदारण्यक उपनिषद् भाष्य
(bṛhadāraṇyaka upaniṣad bhāṣya)
|
4 |
छाण्दोग्य उपनिषद् भाष्य
(chāṇdogya upaniṣad bhāṣya)
|
5 |
ईश उपनिषद् भाष्य
(īśa upaniṣad bhāṣya)
|
6 |
कथोपनिषद् भाष्य
(kaṭhopaniṣad bhāṣya)
|
7 |
केन उपनिषद् भाष्य
(kena upaniṣad bhāṣya)
|
9 |
माण्डूक्य उपनिषद् भाष्य
(māṇḍūkya upaniṣad bhāṣya)
|
10 |
मुण्डक उपनिषद् भाष्य
(muṇḍaka upaniṣad bhāṣya)
|
11 |
प्रश्न उपनिषद् भाष्य
(praśna upaniṣad bhāṣya)
|
12 |
श्वेताश्वतर उपनिषद् भाष्य
(śvetāśvatara bhāṣya)
|
13 |
तैत्त्रेय उपनिषद् भाष्य
(taittreya upaniṣad bhāṣya)
|
Next let us take ब्रह्म सूत्र / शारीरक सूत्र (brahma sūtra / śārīraka sūtra ) which is a युक्ति प्रस्थान (yukti prasthāna – logical exposition). A major commentray called शारीरक भाष्य ( śārīraka bhāṣya) on the same, was written by श्री आदि शंकराचर्य (śrī ādi śaṁkarācarya). Interestingly his commentary was further expanded by श्री वाचस्पति मिश्र (śri vācaspati miśra) & श्री पद्मपाद (śri padmapāda) independently wrote separate भाष्याणि (bhāṣyāṇi - commentaries) on the same titled भामति (bhāmati) & पञ्चपादिका (pañcapādikā) respectively. श्री अमलानन्द (śri amalānanda) in turn wrote independent भाष्याणि (bhāṣyāṇi- commentaries) called वेदान्तकल्पतरु (vedāntakalpataru) & पञ्चपादिका दर्पण (pañcapādikādarpaṇa) on the भामति (bhāmati) & पञ्चपादिका (pañcapādikā) respectively. The former was further commented by श्री अप्पयदीक्षित (śri appayadīkṣita) in his परिमल (parimala) while the श्री प्रकाशात्मन् (śrī prakāśātman) wrote a विवरण (vivaraṇa-gloss) on पञ्चपादिका (pañcapādikā) and so on goes the rich tradition of philosophical commentaries.
For example, Sri R. Thangaswamy in his famous research titled ‘
Advaita Vedanta Literature – A Bibleographic Survey
”,
has traced a huge corpus of commentaries (close to 50) on the
ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य / शारीरक भाष्य (
brahmasūtra
bhāṣya
/
śārīraka
bhāṣya)
alone
.
The same list has been referred by Sri Pulasth Soobah Roodurmun in his famous book called “
Bhamati and Vivarana schools of Advaita Vedanta – A Critical Approach
”.
L
evel
|
भाष्य
(bhāṣya - commentary)
|
भाष्यकार
(bhāṣyakāra – commentator)
|
केवलाद्वैत दर्शन
(kevalādtvaita darśana – absolute nondualistc philosophy)
|
||
A1.0 |
ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य / शारीरक भाष्य (
brahmasūtra
bhāṣya
/
śārīraka
bhāṣya)
|
श्री आदि शंकराचार्य
(śrī ādi śaṃkarācārya)
|
A1.1 |
भामति
(bhāmati)
|
श्री वाचस्पति मिश्र
(śrī vācaspati miśra)
|
A1.1.1 |
ऋजुप्रकाशिका / भामतिव्याख्या
(ṛjuprakāśikā/ bhāmativyākhyā)
|
श्री अखाण्डानन्द
(śrī akhāṇḍānanda)
|
A1.1.2 |
भावदीपिका
(bhāvadīpikā)
|
श्री अच्युतकृष्णानन्द
(śrī acyutakṛṣṇānanda)
|
A1.1.3 |
भामति तिलक
(bhāmati tilaka)
|
श्री अल्लल सूरि
(śrī allala sūri)
|
A1.1.4 |
भामति विलास
(bhāmati vilāsa)
|
Anonymous |
A1.1.5 |
वेदान्त कल्पतरु
(vedānta kalpataru)
|
श्री अमलानन्द
(śrī amalānanda)
|
A1.1.5.1 |
वेदान्त कल्पतरु मञ्जरी
(vedānta kalpataru mañjarī)
|
श्री वैद्यनाथपायगुण्डे
(śrī vaidyanāthapāyaguṇḍe)
|
A1.1.5.2 |
वेदान्त कल्पतरु परिमल
(vedānta kalpataru parimala)
|
श्री अप्पयदीक्षित
(śrī appayadīkṣita)
|
A1.1.5.2.1 |
वेदान्त कल्पतरु परिमल सङ्ग्रह
(vedānta kalpataru parimala saṅgraha)
|
|
A1.1.5.2 |
आभोग
(ābhoga)
|
श्री लक्ष्मीनृसिम्ह
(śrī lakṣmīnṛsimha) |
A1.2 |
पञ्चपादिका
(pañcapādikā)
|
श्री पद्मपाद
(śrī padmapāda)
|
A1.2.1 |
प्रबोध परिशोधिनी
(prabodha pariśodhinī)
|
श्री आत्मसर्वज्ञ
(śrī ātmasarvajña)
|
A1.2.2 |
पञ्चपादिका व्याख्या
(pañcapādikā vyākhyā)
|
श्री आनन्दपूरण विद्यासागर
(śrī ānandapūraṇa vidyāsāgara)
|
A1.2.3 |
वक्तव्य प्रकाशिका
(vaktavya prakāśikā)
|
श्री उत्तमज्ञ यती
(śrī uttamajña yatī)
|
A1.2.4 |
वेदान्तरत्न कोश
(vedāntaratna kośa)
|
श्री नृसिंहाश्रमी
(śrī nṛsiṃhāśramī)
|
A.1.2.5 |
पञ्चपादिका व्याख्या
(pañcapādikā vyākhyā)
|
श्री धर्मराजाध्वरीन्द्र
(śrī dharmarājādhvarīndra)
|
A.1.2.6 |
तात्पर्य द्योतिनी
(tātparya dyotinī)
|
श्री विज्ञानात्म
(śrī vijñānātma)
|
A.1.2.7 |
पञ्चपादिका विवरण
(pañcapādikā vivaraṇa)
|
श्री प्रकाशात्म यती
(śrī prakāśātma yatī)
|
A.1.2.7.1 |
तत्त्वदीपन
(tattvadīpana)
|
श्री अखण्डानन्द मुनि
(śrī akhaṇḍānanda muni)
|
A.1.2.7.2 |
विमलदर्पन
(vimaladarpana)
|
श्री अमलानन्द
(śrī amalānanda)
|
A.1.2.7.3 |
भावद्योतिनी
(bhāvadyotinī)
|
श्री चित्सुखाचार्य
(śrī citsukhācārya)
|
A.1.2.7.4 |
टीकारत्न
(ṭīkāratna)
|
श्री आनन्दपूर्ण
(śrī ānandapūrṇa)
|
A.1.2.7.5 |
ऋजुविवरण
(ṛjuvivaraṇa)
|
श्री विष्णुभट्टोपाध्याय
(śrī viṣṇubhaṭṭopādhyāya)
|
A.1.2.7.6 |
विवरण प्रमेय सङ्ग्रह
(vivaraṇa prameya saṅgraha)
|
श्री विद्यारण्य
(śrī vidyāraṇya)
|
A.1.2.7.7 |
भावप्रकाशिका
(bhāvaprakāśikā)
|
श्री नृसिंहाश्रम
(śrī nṛsiṃhāśrama)
|
A.1.2.7.8 |
विवरणोपन्यास
(vivaraṇopanyāsa)
|
श्री रामानन्द सरस्वती
(śrī rāmānanda sarasvatī)
|
A.1.2.7.9 |
विवरणोज्जीवनी
(vivaraṇojjīvanī)
|
श्री यज्ञेश्वरदीक्षित
(śrī yajñeśvaradīkṣita)
|
A.1.2.7.10 |
भावप्रकाशिका
(bhāvaprakāśikā)
|
श्री पर्व्रजाक
(śrī parvrajāka)
|
A.1.2.7.11 |
व्याख्या
(vyākhyā)
|
श्री रामतीर्थ
(śrī rāmatīrtha)
|
A.1.2.7.11 |
व्याख्या
(vyākhyā)
|
श्री कृष्ण
(śrī kṛṣṇa)
|
A1.3 |
ब्रह्मविद्याभरण
(brahmavidyābharaṇa)
|
श्री अद्वैतानन्द
(śrī advaitānanda)
|
A1.4 |
प्रदीप
(pradīpa)
|
श्री अनन्तकृष्ण शास्त्रि
(śrī ananta kṛṣṇa śāstri)
|
A1.5 |
शारीरक ज्ञान मणिमाल
(śārīraka jñāna maṇimāla)
|
श्री अनन्यानुभाव
(śrī ananyānubhāva)
|
A1.6 |
प्रकार्टाथ विवरण
(prakārṭātha vivaraṇa)
|
श्री अनुभूतिस्वरूपाचार्य
(śrī anubhūtisvarūpācārya)
|
A1.7 |
न्याय निर्णय
(nyāya nirṇaya)
|
श्री आनन्दगिरि
(śrī ānandagiri)
|
A1.8 |
भाष्य सिद्धान्त सङ्ग्रह
(bhāṣya siddhānta saṅgraha)
|
श्री उपनिषद् ब्रह्मेन्द्र
(śrī upaniṣad brahmendra)
|
A1.9 |
आनुन्गुण्य सिद्धि
(ānunguṇya siddhi)
|
श्री कृष्ण शास्त्रि
(śrī kṛṣṇa śāstri)
|
A1.10 |
रत्न प्रभा
(ratna prabhā)
|
श्री रामानन्द
(śrī rāmānanda)
|
A1.11 |
भाष्य भाव प्रकाशिका
(bhāṣya bhāva prakāśikā)
|
श्री चित्सुखाचार्य
(śrī citsukhācārya)
|
A1.12 |
विद्या श्री
(vidyā śrī)
|
श्री ज्ञानोत्तम
(śrī jñānottama)
|
A1.13 |
भाष्याबुप्रभ / भाष्य भानुप्रभ
(bhāṣyābuprabha / bhāṣya bhānuprabha)
|
श्री त्रयंभक शास्त्रि
(śrī trayaṃbhaka śāstri)
|
A1.14 |
भाष्य वार्त्तिक
(bhāṣya vārtika)
|
श्री नारायण सरस्वती
(śrī nārāyaṇa sarasvatī)
|
A1.15 |
भाष्य वार्त्तिक
(bhāṣya vārtika)
|
श्री बालकृष्णान्द
(śrī bālakṛṣṇānda)
|
A1.16 |
भाष्यार्थ सङ्ग्रह
(bhāṣyārtha saṅgraha)
|
श्री ब्रह्मानन्द यती
(śrī brahmānanda yatī)
|
A1.17 |
सुबोधिनी
(subodhinī)
|
श्री शिव नारायण
(śrī śiva nārāyaṇa)
|
A1.18 |
भाष्य सिद्धान्त सङ्ग्रह
(bhāṣya siddhānta saṅgraha)
|
श्री कृष्णानुभूति
(śrī kṛṣṇānubhūti)
|
A1.19 |
भाष्य न्याय सङ्ग्रह
(bhāṣya nyāya saṅgraha)
|
श्री प्रकाशात्म यती
(śrī prakāśātma yatī)
|
Similarly, for श्रीमद् भगवद्गीता (śrīmad bhagavadgītā), which is a साधन प्रस्थान ( sādhana prasthāna – instrumental source) a comprehensive commentary called श्रीमद् भगवद् गीता शंकर भाष्य (śrīmad bhagavad gītā śaṃkara bhāṣya) has been written by श्री आदि शङ्कराचार्य भगवत्पाद (śrī ādi śaṅkarācārya bhagavatpāda).
Interestingly, श्री आदि शङ्कराचार्य भगवत्पाद (śrī ādi śaṅkarācārya bhagavatpāda) has provided a very detailed cross-referencing scriptural testimonies in his प्रस्थानत्रयभाष्याणि ( prasthānatrayabhāṣyāṇi – triple source commentaries) which has been summarized conciely in this table by Sri V. Panoli
Again, in terms of स्तोत्र स्तुति ग्रन्थाः (stotra stuti granthāḥ - eulogical treatizes) it is believed that devotional mystical renderings of श्री आदि शङ्कराचार्य भगवत्पाद (śrī ādi śaṅkarācārya bhagavatpāda) include the following .
# |
स्तोत्रग्रन्थ
(stotragrantha – euological treatise)
|
परब्रह्म
(parabrahma – supreme divinity)
|
1 |
मोह मुद्गर
(
moha mudgara) aka
भज गोविन्दम्
(
bhaja govindam - chant Govinda)
|
महा विष्णु
(
mahā viṣṇu)
|
2 |
शिवानन्द लहरी
(
śivānanda laharī)
|
परमशिव
(
paramaśiva)
|
3 |
श्री सुब्रमण्य भुजङ्गम्
(
śrī subramaṇya bhujaṅgam)
|
षण्मुख
(
ṣaṇmukha)
|
4 |
श्री सौन्दर्य लहरी
(
śrī saundarya laharī)
|
पराशक्ति
(
parāśakti)
|
The following table provides a summary (and definitely not an exhaustive list) of some the other most important works of श्री आदि शङ्कराचार्य भगवत्पाद (śrī ādi śaṅkarācārya bhagavatpāda)
#
|
शास्त्र
(
śāstra – scripture)
|
Category
|
A1
|
विवेकचूडामणि
(vivekacūḍāmaṇi)
|
प्रकरण ग्रन्थ
(prakaraṇa grantha – monograph/treatise text)
|
A2
|
तत्त्व बोध
(
tattva bodha
)
|
प्रकरण ग्रन्थ
(prakaraṇa grantha – monograph/treatise text)
|
A3
|
शतश्लोकी
(śataślokī)
|
प्रकरण ग्रन्थ
(prakaraṇa grantha – monograph/treatise text)
|
A4 |
स्वात्मनिरूपणम्
(svātmanirūpaṇam)
|
प्रकरण ग्रन्थ
(prakaraṇa grantha – monograph/treatise text)
|
A5 |
हरिस्तुतिः
(haristutiḥ)
|
प्रकरण ग्रन्थ
(prakaraṇa grantha – monograph/treatise text)
|
A6 |
दशश्लोकि
(daśaśloki)
|
प्रकरण ग्रन्थ
(prakaraṇa grantha – monograph/treatise text)
|
A7 |
एकश्लोकि
(ekaśloki)
|
प्रकरण ग्रन्थ
(prakaraṇa grantha – monograph/treatise text)
|
A8 |
उपदेशसाशस्रि
(upadeśasāśasri)
|
प्रकरण ग्रन्थ
(prakaraṇa grantha – monograph/treatise text)
|
A9 |
पञ्चीकरण
(pañcīkaraṇa)
|
प्रकरण ग्रन्थ
(prakaraṇa grantha – monograph/treatise text)
|
A10 |
आत्मबोध (
ātmabodha)
|
प्रकरण ग्रन्थ
(prakaraṇa grantha – monograph/treatise text)
|
A11 |
वाक्यसुध / दृग दृश्य विवेक
(vākyasudha/ dṛga dṛśya viveka)
|
प्रकरण ग्रन्थ
(prakaraṇa grantha – monograph/treatise text)
|
A12 |
वाक्यवृत्ति
(vākyavṛtti)
|
प्रकरण ग्रन्थ
(prakaraṇa grantha – monograph/treatise text)
|
A13 |
मनीशपञ्चकम्
(manīśapañcakam)
|
प्रकरण ग्रन्थ
(prakaraṇa grantha – monograph/treatise text)
|
A14 |
यति पञ्च्कम्
(yati pañckam)
|
प्रकरण ग्रन्थ
(prakaraṇa grantha – monograph/treatise text)
|
A15 |
सिद्धान्त तत्त्व
बिन्दु
(siddhānta tattva bindu)
|
प्रकरण ग्रन्थ
(prakaraṇa grantha – monograph/treatise text)
|
A16 |
निर्गुण मानस पूज
(nirguṇa mānasa pūja)
|
प्रकरण ग्रन्थ
(prakaraṇa grantha – monograph/treatise text)
|
A17 |
प्रबोध सुधाकर
(prabodha sudhākara)
|
प्रकरण ग्रन्थ
(prakaraṇa grantha – monograph/treatise text)
|
A18 |
अपरोक्षानुभूतिः
(aparokṣānubhūtiḥ)
|
प्रकरण ग्रन्थ
(prakaraṇa grantha – monograph/treatise text)
|
A19 |
श्री विष्णुसश्रनाम भाष्यम्
(śrī viṣṇusaśranāma bhāṣyam)
|
भाष्य ग्रन्थ
(bhāṣya grantha – commentary text)
|
A20 |
सौन्दर्य लहरी
(saundarya laharī)
|
स्तोत्र ग्रन्थ
(stotra grantha – eulogical text)
|
A21 |
शिवानन्द लहरी
(śivānanda laharī)
|
स्तोत्र ग्रन्थ
(stotra grantha – eulogical text)
|
A22 |
सुब्रमन्य् भुजङ्गम्
(subramany bhujaṅgam)
|
स्तोत्र ग्रन्थ
(stotra grantha – eulogical text)
|
A23 |
श्री दक्षिणामूर्ति स्तोत्रम्
(
śrī dakṣiṇāmūrti stotram)
|
स्तोत्र ग्रन्थ
(stotra grantha – eulogical text)
|
A24 |
बज गोविन्दम्
(bajagovindam)
|
स्तोत्र ग्रन्थ
(stotra grantha – eulogical text)
|
औपचारिक स्थापक षण्मतसंप्रदायस्य (aupacārika sthāpaka ṣaṇmatasaṃpradāyasya – formal establisher of six-theology tradition)
Thus, in terms of theological contribution he plays the unparalleled role of analyzing the inherent polytheistic nature of Hindu DNA and formally consolidating the most popular theologies into an integrated into संप्रदाय षण्मतदेवतानाम् (saṃpradāya ṣaṇmatadevatānām – tradition of sixfold theological deities) viz.
#
|
मतसंप्रदायम्
(matasaṃpradāyam – theological tradition)
|
अधिकार
देवत
(
adhikāra devata – presiding deity)
|
1 |
शैवमतसंप्रदायम्
(śaivamatasaṃpradāyam – shaiva theological tradition)
|
श्री
परमशिव
(śrī paramaśiva)
|
2 |
वैष्णवमतसंप्रदायम्
(vaiṣṇavamatasaṃpradāyam – vaishnava theological tradition)
|
श्री
महाविष्णु
(śrī mahāviṣṇu)
|
3 |
शाक्तमतसंप्रदायम्
(śāktamatasaṃpradāyam – shakti theological tradition)
|
श्री
पराशक्ति
(śrī parāśakti)
|
4 |
गाणपत्यमतसंप्रदायम्
(gāṇapatyamatasaṃpradāyam – Ganesha theological tradition)
|
श्री
गणेश
(śrī gaṇeśa)
|
5 |
कौमारमतसंप्रदायम्
(kaumāramatasaṃpradāyam – kaumara theological tradition)
|
श्री
स्कन्द
(śrī skanda)
|
6 |
सौरमतसंप्रदायम्
(sauramatasaṃpradāyam – sun theological tradition)
|
श्री
सूर्य
(śrī sūrya)
|
This fact is testified by परमाचार्य श्री माधवविद्यारण्य स्वामिन् (paramācārya śrī mādhavavidyāraṇya svāmin) in the following verse
His Holiness
जगद्गुरु श्री चन्द्रशेखरेन्द्र सरसवती स्वामिन्
(jagadguru śrī candraśekharendra sarasavatī svāmin)
more lovingly adored as the
ஸ்ரீ காஞ்சிமகா பெரியவா
(srī kāñcimagā periyavā – supreme sage of Kanchi)
explains thus in one of his famous sermons which was compiled eventually as part of the magnum opus collection viz.
தெய்வத்தின் குரல்
(deivattin kural – voice of god)
by Sri Ra Ganapati
Further, in correspondence with the पञ्चमहावेदयज्ञाः (pañcamahāvedayajñāḥ – five supreme vedic sacrifices) prescribed in the वेदशास्त्र ( vedaśāstra – vedic scripture ), the परमाचार्य ( paramācārya ) lays down पञ्चायतनपूजा ( pañcāyatanapūjā – five fold worship ) to be performed as part of his नित्यकर्मसाधन (nityakarmasādhana – routine obligatory rite) by every able-minded individual during his गृहस्थ आश्रम ( gṛhastha āśrama – householder stage ) . The following table for example summarizes on of the popular forms of शण्मत-पञ्चायतनपूजा (śaṇmata-pañcāyatanapūjā– six-theism five-fold worship)
Category
|
शैवमत
(śaivamata – shaiva theism)
|
कौमारमत
(kaumāra – kumara theism)
|
शाक्तमत
(śāktamata – shakti theism)
|
गाणात्यमत
(gāṇapatya– ganapati theism)
|
वैष्णवमत
(vaiṣṇava– vishnu theism)
|
सौरमत
(sauramata – solar theism)
|
अधिकार देवत
(a
dhikāra devata – Presiding Deity
)
|
श्री परमशिव
(śrī paramaśiva)
|
श्री शिवकुमार
(śrī
śivakumāra
)
|
श्री पराशक्ति
(śrī
parāśakti
)
|
श्री गणेश
(śrī
gaṇeśa
)
|
श्री महाविष्णु
(
śrī mahāviṣṇu
)
|
श्री सूर्य
(śrī
sūrya
)
|
पञ्चायतन पूजा
(
pañcāyatana pūjā – five fold worship
)
|
शिव
पञ्चायतन
(
śiva pañcāyatana
)
|
शक्ति
पञ्चायतन
(
śakti pañcāyatana
)
|
गनपत्य
पञ्चायतन
(
ganapatya pañcāyatana
)
|
विष्णु
पञ्चायतन
(
viṣṇu pañcāyatana
)
|
सूर्य
पञ्चायतन
(
sūrya pañcāyatana
)
|
|
अमूर्तियन्त्र
(amūrtiyantra – aniconic emblem)
|
बानलिङ्ग
(bānaliṅga – oblong stone)
|
सुवर्णमुखी
(suvarṇamukhī – ferric sulfide stone)
|
शोणभद्र
(śoṇabhadra – red-jasper stone)
|
सालग्राम
(sālagrāma- ammonite stone)
|
स्फटिक
(sphaṭika – quartz crystal)
|
|
ईशान्यस्थान
(īśānyasthāna -
north-east position)
|
श्री महाविष्णु
(
śrī mahāviṣṇu)
|
श्री महाविष्णु
(
śrī mahāviṣṇu)
|
श्री महाविष्णु
(
śrī mahāviṣṇu)
|
श्री परमशिव
(śrī paramaśiva)
|
श्री परमशिव
(śrī paramaśiva)
|
|
वायव्यस्थान
(vāyavyasthāna -
north-west position) |
श्री पराशक्ति
(śrī
parāśakti
)
|
श्री सूर्य
(śrī
sūrya
)
|
श्री पराशक्ति
(śrī
parāśakti
)
|
श्री पराशक्ति
(śrī
parāśakti
)
|
श्री पराशक्ति
(śrī
parāśakti
)
|
|
मध्यस्थान
(madhyasthāna – centre position)
|
श्री परमशिव
(śrī paramaśiva)
|
श्री शिवकुमार
(śrī
śivakumāra
)
|
श्री पराशक्ति
(śrī
parāśakti
)
|
श्री गणेश
(śrī
gaṇeśa
)
|
श्री महाविष्णु
(
śrī mahāviṣṇu
)
|
श्री सूर्य
(śrī
sūrya
)
|
दक्षिणप्राचीस्थान
(dakṣiṇaprācīsthāna – south-west position)
|
श्री गणेश
(śrī
gaṇeśa
)
|
श्री गणेश
(śrī
gaṇeśa
)
|
श्री सूर्य
(śrī
sūrya
)
|
श्री सूर्य
(śrī
sūrya
)
|
श्री महाविष्णु
(
śrī mahāviṣṇu
)
|
|
दक्षिणपूर्वास्थान
(dakṣiṇapūrvāsthāna – south-east position)
|
श्री पराशक्ति
(śrī
parāśakti
)
|
श्री परमशिव
(śrī paramaśiva)
|
श्री परमशिव
(śrī paramaśiva)
|
श्री गणेश
(śrī
gaṇeśa
)
|
श्री गणेश
(śrī
gaṇeśa
)
|
Eventually this paved the way for inter-faith harmony and removing theological sectarian disputes within Hinduism. In fact, he is rightly eulogized as
In simple words, he established that the one and only निर्गुण परब्रह्म ( nirguṇa parabrahma – supreme divinity transcending qualities) as the सगुण परमेश्वर ( saguṇa parameśvara – supreme lord with qualities) reveals Himself in multiple theological दिव्यनामानि (divya nāmani – divine names) , दिव्यरूपाणि ( divyarūpāṇi- divine form) , नित्यकल्याणगुणाः (nityakalyāṇaguṇāḥ – eternally auspicious qualities).
His own life and works on devotional mystical renderings in the form of स्तोत्र स्तुति ग्रन्थाः (stotra stuti granthāḥ - eulogical treatizes) serve as the greatest testimony to his non-sectarian & truly secular theological ideology. This is another feather in his cap of श्री आदि शङ्कराचार्य भगवत्पाद (śrī ādi śaṅkarācārya bhagavatpāda) and that is why he is adored as
दर्शनदर्शीक केवलाद्वैतवेदान्तस्य ( darśanadarśīka kevalādvaitavedāntasya – philosophy perspective of absolute non-dualistic final gnosis)
केवलाद्वैतवेदान्त उत्तरमीमांसा दर्शन (kevalādvaitavedānta uttaramīmāṁsādarśana – absolute non-dualistic final wisdom posterior inquiry philosophy) is a ancient school of philosophy originally propunded by परमाचार्य श्री गौडपाद ( paramācārya śrī gauḍapāda ) who was the परमगुरु श्री आदिषंकराचार्यस्य ( paramaguru śrī ādiṣaṃkarācāryasya – grand preceptor of shri adishankaracharya). As this school recognises the परब्रह्मन् (parabrahman – absolute divinity) as the one and only eternal reality - ब्रह्मैव सत्यं (brahmaṁ satyaṁ - divinity is the only reality) , it is popularly refered by this name. Etymologically, the term केवलाद्वैत (kevalādvaita – absolute nonduality) is derived from the terms केवल (kevala - exclusive / absolute) and अद्वैत (advaita - non-duality) . The main crux of this schools philosophy is explained by जगद्गुरु श्री आदिशंकराचार्य भगवत्पाद (jagadguru śrī ādiśaṁkarācārya bhagavatpāda) in the following verses from ब्रह्म ज्ञानवलिमाला (brahma jñānavalimālā)
In fact, the revered जगत् गुरु श्री आदिशंकराचार्य भगवत्पाद (jagat guru śrī ādiśaṁkarācārya bhagavatpāda) , in the following verses from the beautiful treatise titled आत्मबोधः (ātmabodhaḥ - knwoledge of the self)
Please be noted that some academic scholars and subject matter experts researching on the historical aspects of
केवलाद्वैत शास्त्र साहित्य
(kevalādvaita śāstra sāhitya – absolute nondualstic scriptural literature)
are skeptical as to whether the above two works were originally written by
श्री आदिशंकराचार्य
(śrī ādiśaṁkarācārya)
himself or was written much later by some other
आचार्य
(ācārya - preceptor)
belonging to the same lineage. Even in that case, the fact remains that these works represent the
केवलाद्वैत संप्रदाय
(kevalādvaita saṃpradāya – absolute non-dualistic tradition).
Moreover, even if we give the benefit fo doubt to the claims of these scholars and discount the factor it was श्री आदिशंकराचार्य (śrī ādiśaṁkarācārya) who initiated the popular dictum “ ब्रह्म सत्यं जगन्मिथ्या ( brahma satyaṁ jaganmithyā - brahman is real, the universe is false )” highlighting the illusoriness underlying all phenomenal manifestations, there are various other direct and indirect references of similar idea shared by him in some of his प्रस्थानत्रयी भाष्याणि (prasthānatrayī bhāṣyāṇi – triple source commentaries). For example, in his famous शारीरक भाष्य (śārīraka bhāṣya – corporeal commentary) on the बाद्रायण ब्रह्मसूत्र (bādrāyaṇa brahmasūtra) he unequivocally declares thus:
Thus, according to
केवलाद्वैतवेदान्त उत्तरमीमांसा
दर्शन
(kevalādvaitavedānta uttaramīmāṁsādarśana – absolute non-dualistic final wisdom posterior inquiry philosophy)
, the supreme
परब्रह्म
(parabrahma –
absolute divinity
)
is essentially an absolute singularity
निर्गुण
(nirguṇa – beyond attributes)
and
निराकर
(nirākara – without form).
However, the
स्वरूपलक्षणब्रह्मनस्य
(svarūpalakṣaṇabrahmanasya – inherent nature of divinity)
is an inseparable mix of
सत्यं
(
satyaṃ
-
existence
),
ज्ञानं
(jñāna
ṃ
- gnosis)
&
अनन्तं
(a
nantaṃ -
infinity
)
.
In other words, the trinity does not mean three different
add-on attributes of
ब्रह्मन्
(brahman - divinity)
but represents the essentail nature of the same
.
Although
ईश्वर
(īśvara - god)
, is recoginized by
केवलाद्वैतवेदान्त उत्तरमीमांसा
दर्शन
(kevalādvaitavedānta uttaramīmāṁsādarśana – absolute non-dualistic final wisdom posterior inquiry philosophy)
, yet it is not sectarian in the sense that it does not promote any specific deity like
महाविष्णु
(
mahāviṣṇu)
or
परमशिव
(
paramaśiva)
in particular. Moreover, even such a
ईश्वर
(
īśvara
-
god
)
is considered to be a product of
माया
(
māyā - illusion)
and thus
निर्गुण
ब्रह्मन्
(nirguṇa – Divinity beyond attributes)
is the one and only
कैवल्यसत्त्व
(kaivalyasattva – absolute reality)
which is also
निम्मित्त उपादान च कारकवत् कारणाः व्यवहारिकसत्त्वस्य
(nimmitta upādāna ca kārakavat kāraṇāḥ vyavahārikasattvasya – efficient, material and inctrumental causes of phenomenal realm).
To quote Swamy Vivekanandha, a great pattron of advaitic wisdom, “
Ishvara is the supreme interpretation of Brahman, the divine Absolute by relative human thought.”
Fundamentally, the
जीवात्मन्
(
jīvātman
-
corporeal soul
)
is none other than the one and only
परमात्मन्
(
paramātman – supreme soul)
who is technically called as
ब्रह्मन्
(
brahman - divinity).
All kinds of multiplicity and differences in attributes and forms are the product of
अविद्यामाया
(
avidyāmāyā- nescient mystery)
.
Because of the emphasis of the concept of
माया
(
māyā – mystery/illusion
)
in this school, it is sometimes called as the
मायावाद
(
māyavāda – illusion doctrine)
by other schools. Please be noted that
अविद्यामाया
(
avidyāmāyā- nescient mystery)
is used here in the sense of
अनिर्वचनीय ख्याति
(
anirvacanīya khyāti -
indeterminate cognition
)
which manifests itself in the following two ways with respect to
with respect to
अध्यास वाद
अविद्या मायायाः
(adhyāsa vāda avidyā māyāyāḥ – doctrine of superimposition of nescient mystery)
.
·
आवरणशक्ति
(
ā
vara
ṇ
a
ś
akti – concealing power)
:
It is the
तिरस्कार /
आवरण शक्ति
(tiraskāra / āvaraṇa śakti – concealing force)
that encapsulates the
सत्यस्वरूपपरब्रह्मनस्य
(satyasvarūpaparabrahmanasya – real nature of supreme divinity)
. This illustrated by the famous example of the reality of a rope being conceiled by ignorance and
·
विक्षेपशक्ति
(vikṣepaśakti – projective power)
:
This is kind of
विवर्ताध्यास
(vivartādhyāsa – apparent superimposition)
that makes the rope to appear as a snake.
The next important point to understand is that
केवलाद्वैतवेदान्त उत्तरमीमांसा
दर्शन
(kevalādvaitavedānta uttaramīmāṁsādarśana – absolute non-dualistic final wisdom posterior inquiry philosophy)
also advocates
एकसत्तावाद / सत्तैक्यवाद
(ekasattāvāda / sattaikyavāda – doctrine of single reality / single identity)
which is summarized by
श्री सुरेश्वराचार्य
(śrī sureśvarācārya)
in his
मानसोल्लास
(mānasollāsa)
which is his
भाष्य
(bhāṣya - commentary)
on the
श्री दक्षिनामूर्ति स्तोत्र
(śrī dakṣināmūrti stotra)
composed by
श्री आदि शंकराचार्य भगवत्पाद
(śrī ādi śaṃkarācārya bhagavatpāda
)
However, according to the
अध्यासवाद
अविद्यामायायाः
(adhyāsavāda avidyāmāyāyāḥ – doctrine of superimposition of nescient mystery)
the
आवरणशक्ति
(
ā
vara
ṇ
a
ś
akti – concealing power)
encapsulates the underlying
एकसत्ता
(ekasattā – single reality)
while the
विक्षेपशक्ति
(vikṣepaśakti – projective power)
manifests the
त्रिस्वभाव सत्त्व
(trisvabhāva sattva – triple natured existence).
In other words, reality operates in three planes of consciousness listed in the ascending order of their superiority viz.
# |
लक्षणसत्त्वस्य
(lakṣaṇasattvasya
– nature of realm
)
|
Description |
A |
अनित्यसत्यम्
(anityasatyam – transcient truth)
|
|
1 |
प्रातिभासिक
सत्त्वं
(
prātibhāsika sattvaṁ
– illusory realm
)
|
The illusory plane of consciousness, like mistaking the rope to be a snake and experiencing the associated fear |
2 |
व्यावहारिक सत्त्वं
(
vyāvahārika sattvaṁ – empirical realm
)
|
Next comes the empirical plane of day to day practical consciousness where in one observes and experiences all kinds of multiplicities and varieties in the world
|
B |
नित्यसत्यम्
(nityasatyam – eternal truth)
|
|
3 |
पारमार्थिक सत्त्वं
(
pāramārthika
sattvaṁ
– ultimate/noumenal realm)
|
Finally, comes the transcendent plane of absolute consciousness which is the
अनेकान्तपरिपूरणकेवलाद्वैतपरब्रह्मन्सच्चिदानन्दम्
(
anekāntaparipūraṇakevalādvaitaparabrahmansaccidānandam - multivalent holistic absolute nondualistic existence-consciousness-bliss)
|
Thus,
केवलाद्वैतवेदान्त उत्तरमीमांसा
दर्शन
(kevalādvaitavedānta uttaramīmāṁsādarśana – absolute non-dualistic final wisdom posterior inquiry philosophy)
also preaches
विवर्तवाद
(
vivartavāda – apparance doctrine)
according to which, the world out there, is technically called as the
व्यावहारिक सत्त्वं
(
vyāvahārika sattvaṁ – empirical realm
)
is only a
अनित्यसत्यम्
(anityasatyam – transcient truth)
and hence is consdered merely as the
विवर्तव्यक्तत्व
(vivartavyaktatva – phenomenal manifestation),
whereas the
पारमार्थिक सत्त्वं
(
pāramārthika
sattvaṁ
– ultimate/noumenal realm)
is the one and only
नित्यसत्यम्
(nityasatyam – eternal truth).
The next important point to understand is that over the centuries, the
केवलाद्वैतवेदान्त उत्तरमीमांसा
दर्शन
(kevalādvaitavedānta uttaramīmāṁsādarśana – absolute non-dualistic final wisdom posterior inquiry philosophy)
has branched itself into various sub-schools expanding upon the
विवर्तवाद
(
vivartavāda – apparance doctrine)
in terms of providing alternate explanations regargin the
लक्षणविक्षेपश्कतेः अध्यासस्य
(lakṣaṇa vikṣepaśkateḥ adhyāsasya – nature of the projective power of superimposition)
#
|
दर्शनस्य नाम
(darśanasya nāma – name of philosophy)
|
प्रवार्तक परमाचार्य
(pravārtaka paramācārya – primary foounding preceptor)
|
A |
केवलाद्वैत अजातिवाद
(k
evalādvaita ajātivāda - absolute nondualistic non-orignation doctrine)
|
श्री गौडपादाचार्य
(śrī gauḍapādācārya)
|
B |
केवलाद्वैत प्रतिबिंबवाद
(k
evalādvaita pratibiṃbavāda - absolute nondualistic reflection doctrine)
more
popularly known as
विवरण प्रस्थान
(vivaraṇa prasthāna)
|
श्री पद्मपादाचार्य
(śrī padmapādācārya) &
श्री प्रकाशात्मनाचार्य
(śrī prakāśātmanācārya)
|
C |
केवलाद्वैत अभासवाद
(k
evalādvaita abhāsavāda - absolute nondualistic appearance doctrine)
|
श्री सुरेश्वराचार्य
(śrī sureśvarācārya) &
श्री सर्वज्ञात्मनाचार्य
(śrī sarvajñātmanācārya)
|
D |
केवलाद्वैत अविच्छेदवाद
(
kevalādvaita avicchedavāda - absolute nondualistic limtation doctrine)
more
popularly known as
भामति प्रस्थान
(bhāmati prasthāna)
|
श्री मण्डनमिश्राचार्य
(śrī maṇḍanamiśrācārya)
&
श्री वाचस्पतिमिश्राचार्य
(
śrī vācaspatimiśrācārya
)
|
E |
केवलाद्वैत अविभागाद्वैत
(
kevalādvaita avibhāgādvaita -undifferentiated absolute nondualism)
|
श्री वीज्ञानभिक्षु
(śrī vījñānabhikṣu)
|
From a epistemological perspective,
केवलाद्वैतवेदान्त उत्तरमीमांसा
दर्शन
(kevalādvaitavedānta uttaramīmāṁsādarśana – absolute non-dualistic final wisdom posterior inquiry philosophy)
school recognises all the
षड्विधप्रमाणाः ज्ञान्स्य
(
ṣaḍvidhapramāṇāḥjñānsya – sixfold epistemological mesasures of knowledge
)
viz.
# |
प्रमा
ण
(pramā
ṇa
-
process of knowing
)
|
1 |
प्रत्यक्ष
(pratyakṣa - perception)
|
2 |
अनुमान
(
anumāna - inference)
|
3 |
उप्मान
(
upmāna - comparision)
|
4 |
शब्द
(
śabda - testimony)
|
5 |
अनुपालब्धि
(anupālabdhi - non apprehension)
|
6 |
अर्थापत्ति
(
arthāpatti - hypothesis
)
|
This fact is testified in the वेदान्तपरिभाषा ( ved ā ntaparibh āśā ) which is a famous प्रमाणविद्या प्रकरण (pramāṇavidyā prakaraṇa – epistomology treatise) written by आचार्य श्री धर्मराज अध्वारिन्द्र ( ācārya śrī dharmar ā ja adhv ā rindra)
But please remember that amongst the
षड्विधप्रमाणाः ज्ञान्स्य
(
ṣaḍvidhapramāṇāḥjñānsya – sixfold epistemological mesasures of knowledge
),
this school values the
शब्दप्रमाणवेदशास्त्रस्य
(
śabdapramāṇavedaśāstrasya – testimonial validaion of vedic scripture)
as the ultimate authority, particularly when it comes to understanding the
पारमार्थिक सत्त्वं
(
pāramārthika
sattvaṁ
– ultimate/noumenal realm)
. Moreover, even there it gives higher validity to the
ज्ञानखाण्डानि वेदसंहिताणाम्
(jñānakhāṇḍāni vedasaṃhitāṇām – gnostic sections of the vedic corpuses)
rather than the
कर्म
खाण्डानि वेदसंहिताणाम्
(karmakhāṇḍāni vedasaṃhitāṇām – ritual sections of the vedic corpuses)
.
From a soteriological perspective, this school believes that sublimation of the sense of individuality bound by
माया
(
māyā - illusion
)
and absolute unification with the
ब्रह्मन्
(
brahman - divinity)
leads to
परमुक्ति
(paramukti -
ultimate salvation
)
. In the words of
आदि शंकराचार्य भगवत्पाद
(ādi śaṁkarācārya bhagavatpāda)
,
To this end, two modes of emanation are recognized viz. the lower and higher states of spiritual enlightenment depending upon whether the soul realizes the
सगुण ब्रह्मन्
(
saguṇa brahman – divinity with qualities
)
or the
निर्गुण ब्रह्मन्
(
nirguṇa brahman – divinity beyond qualities
)
. While the former can attain only
क्राम मुक्ति
(
kr
ā
ma mukti
-
gradual liberation
) through
विदेह मुक्ति
(vidheha mukti)
by taking the
देवयान
(devayāna
-
divine path)
to the highest
ब्रह्मलोक
(brahmaloka – divine realm),
the latter case are previlidged for
जीवन्मुक्ति
(jīvanmukti – living liberation)
by leading a life of renunciation engaged in selfless
निश्कामकर्म
(niśkāmakarma – desireless service).
निगमन (nigamana - conclusion)
Moreover, in my humble opinion, श्री आदि शङ्कराचार्य भगवत्पाद (śrī ādi śaṅkarācārya bhagavatpāda) also deserves to be called as the Father figure playing the role of the original seed of पवित्र वटवृक्ष वेदान्त दर्शनस्य (p avitra vaṭavṛkṣa vedānta darśanasya - Holy Banyantree of final philosophical wisdom) from which all other branches and even other genetically mutated Vedantic seeds evolved eventually, just as one biological species evolves from another species eventually. For example, the sacred विशिष्टाद्वैतवेदान्तदर्शन (viśiṣṭādvaita vedānta darśana – qualified non-dualistic final-wisdom philosophy) and the द्वैत वेदान्तदर्शन ( dvaita vedānta darśana – dualsitic final-wisdom philosophy ) are but honorable examples of such philosophical evolution. Although there could be many ideological differences between these schools and the केवलाद्वैतवेदान्तदर्शन (kevalādtvaita vedānta darśana – absolute non-dualistic final-wisdom philosophy) , yet it is an undeniable fact that श्री आदि शङ्कराचार्य भगवत्पाद (śrī ādi śaṅkarācārya bhagavatpāda) has laid the common foundation stone for them as well.
We can compare this with the evolution of modern physics wherein the contribution of one scientists leads to the other. For example, Sir Isaac Newton's revolutionary theories on the laws of mechanics and gravity are his humble learning and respectful deviations from the works of his predecessors like Aristotle, Rene Descartes, Galileo Galilee, and Johannes Kepler etc... In fact, Newton himself acknowledges this when he humbly admits “
I have seen farther other men, it is because I have stood on the shoulders of giants
”
Similarly, Albert Einstein made his astounding discoveries of Relativistic physics standing on the shoulders of Newton.You might argue that these schools are fundamentally contradicting with each other as one talks about monism, while other qualified monism and the third complete duality. How can we say they have a common ground? Well if you think deeply u can find the common thread tying all these doctrines together. Of course, one may have to deep dive into their philosophies to see the common truth underlying the apparent differences. Here are my two cents for you.
श्री आदि शङ्कराचार्य भगवत्पाद
(śrī ādi śaṅkarācārya bhagavatpāda)
very carefully worded his school of philosophy as
अद्वैत दर्शन
(
advaita darśana - non-dualistic philosophy)
and not as
एकत्व दर्शन
(
ekatva darśana - monistic philosophy)
. In other words,
द्वैत
(
dvaita - duality)
is hidden parameter in the philosophy of
अद्वैत
(
advaita - nonduality)
disguised as the
अनिर्वचनीयमाया
(
anirvacanīyamāyā – ineffable /indeterminable mystery)
and hence
द्वैत
(
dvaita - duality)
and
विशिष्टाद्वैत
(
viśiṣṭādvaita - qualified non duality)
are potentially derivable from it. This is a very important point for us to understand and appreciate the genius in
श्री आदि शङ्कराचार्य भगवत्पाद
(śrī ādi śaṅkarācārya bhagavatpāda)
.
For example, subsequent to the era of श्री आदि शङ्कराचार्य भगवत्पाद (śrī ādi śaṅkarācārya bhagavatpāda), the उत्तरमीमांस / वेदान्त दर्शन( uttaramīmāṃsa/vedānta darśana - posterior inquiry / final wisdom philosophy) nurtured itself int a huge tree branching into various schools like
#
|
दर्शनस्य नाम
(darśanasya nāma – name of philosophy)
|
प्रवार्तक परमाचार्य
(pravārtaka paramācārya – primary foounding preceptor)
|
A
|
केवलाद्वैतदर्शन
(kevalādtvaita darśana – absolute nondualstc philosophy)
|
श्री आदिशंकराचार्य भगवद्पाद
(śrī ādiśaṁkarācārya bhagavadpāda)
|
B
|
विशिष्टाद्वैतदर्शन
(viśiṣṭādvaita darśana – qualified nondualistic philosophy)
|
श्री रामानुजाचार्य
(śrī rāmānujācārya)
|
C
|
द्वैत
दर्शन
(dvaita darśana – dualsitic philosophy)
|
श्री मद्वचार्य
(śrī madvacārya)
|
D
|
औपाधिक भेदाभेद दर्शन
(aupādhika bhedābheda
darśana – different yet non-different philosophy)
|
श्री
भास्कराचार्य
(śrī bhāskarācārya)
|
E
|
अचिन्त्य भेद अभेद दर्शन
(acintya bheda abheda darśana)
|
श्रील रूपा गोस्वामि
(śrīla rūpā gosvāmi)
|
F
|
शुद्धाद्वैत दर्शन
(śuddhādvaita darśana – pure nondualstic philosophy)
|
श्री वल्लभाचार्य
(śrī vallabhācārya)
|
G
|
स्वभाविक
द्वैताद्वैत
दर्शन
(svabhāvika dvaitādvaita darśana – dual yet nondualistic philosophy)
|
श्री निम्बार्काचार्य
(śrī nimbārkācārya)
|
Thus, on this eventful day of his महा अवतार जयन्ति (mahā avatāra jayanti - sacred incarnation anniversary) I feel blessed in contemplating on his life and contribution to spirituality I offer my humble salutations at his holy feet recollecting the golden verses
जय जय शङ्कर हर हर शङ्कर॥
संलग्न (saṃlagna - appendix)
My 2 cents on the controversies regarding authorship of विवेकचूडामणिः (vivekacūḍāmaṇiḥ - crest jewel of discrimination)
While only श्री आदि शंकराचार्य भगवत्पाद (śrī ādi śaṃkarācārya bhagavatpāda) would probably be the final authority on whether he was the author of विवेकचूडामणिः (vivekacūḍāmaṇiḥ - crest jewel of discrimination) (and similar texts under controversy on his authorship). While traditional orthodoxy including the long list of great आचार्य परंपरा (ācārya paraṃparā – preceptor lineage) from the last 2000+ years of पञ्चास्य मठ संप्रदायाः (pañcāsya maṭha saṃpradāyāḥ - fivefold monastic traditions) established by the जगत्गुरु (jagatguru – global preceptor) Himself. This list includes many मुख्य आचार्याः (mukhya ācāryāḥ - chief preceptors) starting from his trusted अनन्तर शिष्याः (anantara śiṣyāḥ - direct disciples) like श्री पद्मपादाचार्य (śrī padmapādācārya) & श्री सुरेश्वराचार्य (śrī sureśvarācārya) etc., upto the more recent ones viz. His Holiness श्री चन्द्रशेखरेन्द्र सरस्वती (śrī candraśekharendra sarasvatī) & श्री चन्द्रशेखर भारति (śrī candraśekhara bhārati) who were lovingly called as the Sage of Kānci , & Sage of Sringeri respectively.
Let us now ask ourselves, how
many of them in this honorable list were disputing i.e., were denying/doubting
the authorship of
विवेकचूडामणिः
(vivekacūḍāmaṇiḥ - crest jewel of discrimination)
ascribed to
श्री आदि शंकराचार्य भगवत्पाद
(śrī ādi śaṃkarācārya bhagavatpāda)
?
Please remember that this long
and rich tradition of subject matter experts, were not only upholders of the
केवलाद्वैत
संप्रदाय
(kevalādvaita saṃpradāya – absolute nondualstic tradtion)
but
were also
अनुष्टाण
अद्वैतिनः
(anuṣṭāṇa advaitinaḥ - practicing nondualists)
through
their thoughts, words and deeds. In fact, many of them were
ब्रह्मज्ञान
जिवन्मुक्ताः
(brahmajñāna jivanmuktāḥ - spiritually enlightened
living liberates)
, as testified by their life histories.
Moreover, the rich tradition of
many other eminent
मुख्य
अद्वैत
आचार्याः
(mukhya advaita ācāryāḥ - chief preceptors of nonduality)
and
their establishments belonging to last two centuries viz.
Bhagavān
Śrī
Ramana Mahaṛṣi
(&
Ramanāśram
),
Bhagavān Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa Paramahaṃsa
(Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa Mission/Mutt)
and
Sw
ā
mi Chinmay
ā
nanda
(&
Chinmay
ā
nanda
Mission
)
etc. have also consistently ascribed the authorship of the text to
श्री आदि शंकराचार्य भगवत्पाद
(śrī ādi śaṃkarācārya bhagavatpāda)
.
For
example,
Bhagavān
Śrī Ramana Mahaṛṣi
in
his famous introductory summary of the text, very clearly states thus:
Every being in the world yearns to be always happy and free from the taint of sorrow, and desires to get rid of bodily ailments, etc., which are not of its true nature. Further, everyone cherishes the greatest love for himself, and this love is not possible in the absence of happiness. In deep sleep, though devoid of everything, one has the experience of being happy. Yet, due to the ignorance of the real nature of one’s own being, which is happiness itself , people flounder in the vast ocean of material existence, forsaking the right path that leads to happiness, and act under the mistaken belief that the way to be happy consists in obtaining the pleasures of this and the other world. Unfortunately, however, there is no such happiness which has not the taint of sorrow . It is precisely for the purpose of pointing out the straight path to true happiness that Lord Shiva, taking on the guise of Sri Shankaracharya, wrote the commentaries on the Triple Canon [Prasthana Traya] of the Vedanta, which extols the excellence of this bliss; and that he demonstrated it by his own example in life. These commentaries, however, are of little use to those ardent seekers who are intent upon realising the bliss of liberation but have not the scholarship necessary for studying them. It is for such as these that Sri Shankara revealed the essence of the commentaries in this short treatise , The Crown Gem of Discrimination [Vivekachudamani], explaining in detail the points that have to be grasped by those who seek liberation, and thereby directing them to the true and direct path. ”
Similarly, His Holiness Sw ā mi Chinmay ā nanda unequivocally declares,
Vedanta is truly the Science of Life. Sri Shankara, the great interpreter of Vedanta, not only gave us his commentaries on the Upanishads, the Brahma Sutras and the Bhagavad Gita, but also many primary texts which introduce the seeker to the joys of Vedanta. One of the greatest texts he has written as an introduction to Vedanta, is the Viveka Choodamani, which means, ‘The Crest-Jewel of Discrimination.
Again, Swami Madhav ā nanda of RKM order in the foreword of his famous translation has clearly stated
Being an original production of Sankara’s genius, the book
Similarly, श्री चन्द्रशेखर भारति (śrī candraśekhara bhārati) in his famous commentarial work on the sacred text explains thus:
In the realm of religion Sri Samkara is a great revivalist…all these stemmed from the philosophy of Advaita which he taught as the central truth of the Upanishads, the Brahma Sutras and the Bhagavad Gita known as Prasthana Traya of Indian Philosophy…The study of these prasthanatraya-bhashyas require profound knowledge of Samskrit and proficiency in Vyakarana, Nyaya and Mimamsa and in Veda adhyayana…But Sri Bhagavatpada realized that not all will be thus qualified. Intending to instruct such persons in the truth of Advaita Vedanta, he wrote what are called as prakarana granthas in verse and prose varying from a single sloka to a thousand. The more important among these are the Satasloki, Sarva Vedanta Sara Sangraha, the Upadesa Sahasri and the Vivekachudamani…
However, authorship of
विवेकचूडामणिः
(vivekacūḍāmaṇiḥ - crest jewel of discrimination)
which
has always been traditionally (as testified by above saint-scholars) ascribed
to
श्री आदि शंकराचार्य भगवत्पाद
(śrī ādi śaṃkarācārya bhagavatpāda)
,
has
been questioned by some modern-day academic scholars and professors
(predominantly from Western world) like Daniel Ingalls, Michael Coman, A. J.
Alston etc. Please remember that with all due respects, we should realize
that most of these scholars are more academicians rather than practicing
saints. So their modus operandi for their speculations regarding the authorship
is confined to mortal intellectual means of linguistic, philosophic textual
analysis – technically called as
अपर
विद्या
(apara vidyā – mundane / lower knowledge),
(with
very few honorable exceptions like His Holiness
Śrī Satcitānanda Sarasvatī
) unlike
the case of those on the other side of the table, wherein the advocates include
ब्रह्मज्ञान
जिवन्मुक्ताः
(brahmajñāna jivanmuktāḥ - spiritually enlightened
living liberates)
.
As ordinary seekers like many of us take
sides one way or the other based on our personal intellectual bias towards one
of these postulates. We also take a boolean approach that if we consider
प्रस्थानत्रयी भाष्यानि
(prasthānatrayī bhāṣyāni – commentaries on triple sources)
authored
by
श्री आदि शंकराचार्य भगवत्पाद
(śrī ādi śaṃkarācārya bhagavatpāda)
are
(seemingly) bordering on
ज्ञानमार्ग
(jñānamārga – wisdom path)
is
appears to be inconsistent his other works which seems to be focusing on other
मार्गाः
(mārgāḥ - paths)
viz.
विवेकचूडामणिः
(vivekacūḍāmaṇiḥ - crest jewel of discrimination)
,
योगसूत्रभाष्य
विवरण
(yogasūtrabhāṣya vivaraṇa)
etc.
touching upon topics of
समाधि
(samādhi - atonement)
etc. pertaining
to
योग
मार्ग
(yoga mārga – path of communion)
,
श्री
सौन्दर्यलहरी
(śrī saundaryalaharī)
,
श्री
सुब्रह्मण्यभुजङ्गम्
(śrī subrahmaṇyabhujaṅgam)
etc.,
touching upon topics pertaining to
भक्ति
मार्ग
(bhakti mārga – path of devotion)
,
कुमालिनी
योग
(ku
ņď
alinī yoga - biomagnetic union)
etc.
But IMHO, the inconsistencies are more superficial...
as wisdom is an ocean of spiritual continuum. Truth is one. Moreover, we also
we have evidence that
आचार्याः
(ācāryāḥ - preceptors)
like
आचार्य
श्री
वाचस्पति
मिश्र
(ācārya
śrī vācaspati miśra
)
and
आचार्य
श्री
विज्ञानभिक्षु
(ācārya śrī vijñānabhikṣu)
have written
भाष्यानि
(bhāṣyāni – commentaries)
across
multiple seemingly desperate
दर्शनानि
(darśanāni - philosophies)
including
न्याय
(nyāya)
,
सांख्य
(sāṃkhya)
,
योग
(yoga)
&
वेदान्त
(vedānta)
etc. It
is the same
आचार्य
श्री
वाचस्पति
मिश्र
(ācārya śrī vācaspati miśra)
who
wrote respective
भाष्यानि
(bhāṣyāni – commentaries)
like
तात्पर्यटीका
(tātparyaṭīkā),
सांख्यतत्त्वकौमुदि
(sāṃkhyatattvakaumudi)
,
योग
तत्त्व
वैशारदि
(yoga tattva vaiśāradi)
,
शारीरक
भाष्य
भामति
(śārīraka bhāṣya bhāmati)
for each of those schools. Just because these
भाष्यानि
(bhāṣyāni – commentaries)
focus
on different
दर्शनानि
(darśanāni - philosophies)
, it does
not mean, they were not written by the same person – in this case
आचार्य
श्री
वाचस्पति
मिश्र
(
ācārya śrī vācaspati miśra)
.
Moreover, even if we take the huge corpus of
अपौरुषेय
शब्द
(apauruṣeya śabda – superhuman logos)
viz.
वेद
/
श्रुति
संहिता
(veda
śruti saṃhitā– Vedic corpus)
including
the
ऋग्
वेद
मन्त्र
(ṛgvedamantra),
यजुर्
वेद
मन्त्र
(yajuvedarmantra),
सामवेदमन्त्र
(sāmvedaamantra)
&
अथर्ववेदमन्त्र
(atharvavedamantra)
and their
corresponding
उपनिषदः
(upaniṣadaḥ - upanishads)
.
In
fact, if one looks superficially, even within each
उपनिषदः
(upaniṣad - upanishad)
there
could be potential areas of seeming inconsistences between the
श्रुति
वाक्याः
(śruti vākyāḥ - revelatory statements)
apparently
seeming to favor one
वेदान्त
दर्शन
(
vedānta
darśana – Vedanta philosophy
)
say
केवलाद्वैत
(kevalādvaita – absolute nonduality)
,
over
the others viz.
विशिष्टाद्वैत
(viśiṣṭādvaita – qualified nonduality)
and
द्वैत
(
dvaita
- duality),
or even the other way
round. Same logic applies to
ब्रह्म
सूत्र
(brahma sūtra)
&
श्रीमद्
भगवद्गीता
(śrīmad bhagavadgītā).
Again,
in these scriptures, there are sections where
भक्ति
मार्ग
(bhakti mārga – path of devotion)
seems
to predominate over
ज्ञान
मार्ग
(jñāna mārga – path of knowledge)
,
योग
मार्ग
(yoga mārga - path of yoga)
&
कर्म
मार्ग
(karma mārga – path of servitude).
Citing
such reasons, can we say these texts are inconsistent? Just because different
chapters of
श्रीमद्
भगवद्गीता
(śrīmad bhagavadgītā)
give
predominance to different
मार्गाः
(mārgāḥ - paths),
can
we conclude that it is not the
उपदेश
(upadeśa - teaching)
of the same
भगवान्
श्री कृष्णपरमात्म
(bhagavān śrī kṛṣṇaparamātma)
as
there are seeming inconsistencies across chapters or can we conclude it cannot
be the authored by
श्री
व्यास
महऋषि
(śrī vyāsa mahaṛṣi)
?
I think all of us will agree that
if we take a holistic deep dive and connect the dots, these superficial
inconsistencies will give way to integral synergies. For after-all, the waves
of inconsistencies are only at the superficial level and once we deep dive into
the depths of the ocean beds, the highs and lows of the waves vanish, and
sameness prevails.
Let us take some recent examples, it was
Bhagavān
Śrī Ramana Mahaṛṣi
who
has given us highest form of
ज्ञानमार्ग
उपदेश
(jñānamārga upadeśa – teaching of wisdom path)
through
his
நான்
யார்
(nān yār - Who Am I)
?
” and
உள்ளது
நாற்பது
(uḻḻadu nārpadu – forty verses of reality)
. At the
same time, it is the same
Bhagavān
Śrī
Ramana Mahaṛṣi
who blessed us with his mystical outpourings of highest
devotional trance through his poems like the
அக்ஷரமணமாலை
(akṣaramaṇamālai - Marital Garland of Letters)
.
Again, it is the same
Bhagavān
Śrī Ramana Mahaṛṣi
who
gave discourses on
योग
(yoga - yoga),
ध्यान
(dhyāna -
meditation)
&
समाधि
(samādhi
- atonement).
Similarly, Bhagavān Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa Paramahaṃsa considered
to be one of the greatest
अद्वैतिन्
(advaitin
- nondualist)
in recent times, was also a
परम
भक्त
(parama bhakta – supreme devotee) of
देवी
श्री
काली
(devī śrī kālī)
and
was a seamless practitioner of
सादनाः
(sādanāḥ -
techniques)
pertaining to
तन्त्र
(tantra – tantra)
,
योग
(yoga – yoga)
as well as
वेदान्त
(vedānta – vedanta).
Again,
Swami Vivekananda
,
his chief
disciple, was also an accomplished
ज्ञानिन्
(jñānin –
enlightened one)
&
योगिन्
(yogin – yogi) and has written in detail about all
the
चतुर्
मार्गाः
(catur mārgāḥ - four paths).
Hence,
from these testimonies, it is clear that, works of saints are not based on a
general Boolean algorithm but rather are based on quantum computing algorithms
(superposition values). Just because one observes that there are seeming
inconsistencies across the different works of a saint, we cannot jump to the
conclusion that these texts are not the works of the saint. The inconsistencies
observed are only superficial and once we deep-dive, we can connect the dots
and appreciate the holistic picture.
All the
मार्गाः
(mārgāḥ - paths)
are not watertight
Boolean compartments (variables) but rather are like quantum computing
variables where more than one value can be superimposed simultaneously (1 &
0 can co-exist). In fact, that is the very essence of South Indian temple architectural
symbology wherein every temple has
चतुर्
द्वाराः
(catur dvārāḥ - four gates)
corresponding
to
चतुर्
मार्गाः
(catur mārgāḥ - four paths)
and from the perspective of
मूल
विग्रह
(mūla vigraha – presiding deity
)
all
paths are same
In my humble opinion, the same
logic applies to the works of our revered saints as well. The main problem is
we tend to judge the works of saints also with a Boolean lens (if 1 it cannot
be 0, if 0 it cannot be 1). We assume that if a saint is a
ब्रह्म
ज्ञानि
(brahma jñāni),
he cannot
be a
ब्रह्म
योगि
(brahma yogi)
or a
ब्रह्म
भक्त
(brahma bhakta).
However,
life histories of saints have proven otherwise.
Similar Topic Reference:
श्री रामानुजाचार्य अवतार जयन्ति
(
śrī rāmānujācārya avatāra jayanti - Sri Ramanujacharya incarnation anniversary)
|
https://whatisgod-religiousfestivals.blogspot.com/p/sri-ramanujacarya-avatara-jayanti-sri.html
|
No comments:
Post a Comment